![]() They clearly state that this is supposed to be "under load" (I interpret this as a gaming load or similar relatively even and high CPU+GPU load) in which case significant transient loads are relatively unlikely and not likely to make much of a difference due to the significant stress already on the PSU. Unless the PSU is bad/old such sag doesn't happen.Īlso some rubbish, there is no power graph.I disagree with your interpretation. In reality the GPU itself has those caps, also making these claims a fairy tail. Crmaris does this always, albeit in different manner, without capacities at all. Well it is written totally in awkward manner, but the numbers only make sense about voltage sag(Transient Response), when doing instant high burst current loads for the GPU. Posted on Sep 23rd 2019, 12:58 Reply #18 randomUserįerrum MasterIt states. That's nearly a 28% reduction in voltage variation from the external power source!Also some rubbish, there is no power graph. ![]() The 12V line going into graphics card without a PowerLink under load rates a Peak-to-Peak voltage of 1,008mV, while the 12V line going into the graphics card with a PowerLink is only 728mV. Unless the PSU is bad/old such sag doesn't happen. And speaking of peak-to-peak voltages makes zero sense if you're talking about voltage drop.It states. You need sense wires and a PSU capable of monitoring them to combat wire voltage drop. ValantarYou mean voltage drop over the power cables? That doesn't measure like what we see in those graphs (those are spruced-up scope shots of riople/noise), and capacitors in the cables does nothing to combat that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |